[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Retracting the term ownership
From: |
Tom Bachmann |
Subject: |
Re: Retracting the term ownership |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:42:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060826) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Christian Stüble wrote:
> The interesting question for me is whether [a)] the negative scenarios coming
> with this technologie are caused by a bad design of the technology, or
> whether
> [b)] these bad examples are a logical consequence of a design that
> allows the "good" ones [...]
Can you show me _one_ technology that inherently only allows negative
scenarios? I cannot. I suspect such thing as inherent good or inherent
bad do not exist.
Therefore, *my* answer to your question is b).
But it immediately follows from my argumentation above that I cannot
agree with you about the interestingness of the question. The mere
existance of good scenarios does not justify the use of a technology,
especially not if we can see _very_ bad scenarios and, and this is
special about TC/DRM, this technology will be used by nearly everyone.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE+ABzvD/ijq9JWhsRAg/MAJ9HBDjCDq1UIqDjCQUIoAnn6nSqdgCcD/go
VlnucSWtiulghAS3C7NI/4E=
=EBAG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----