|
From: | Anton Tagunov |
Subject: | Re: To Pierre |
Date: | Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:25:09 +0300 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) |
Anton> RIAA needs both "non-free" OS + Chip to enforce real DRM Pierre> And as far as enforcing DRM is concerned, a free OS is as Pierre> good as a proprietary one. TPM doesn't relies on closeness Pierre> of source code but on cryptographic protocols Right! In desire of brevity I've misused words. What I mean is if all computer owners run a Free OS that _also_ allows memory inspection for any process (w/o it's permission!) then DRM is bustered. Pierre> blackbox algorithms don't require opaque memory Pierre> replace process instanciation by service invocation Pierre> to achieve blackbox algorithms Got you. Hope a discussion may stem in my new mail thread: "To Jonathan [backdoor]" where I advocate the notion of a "backdoor" for computer owner to inspect memory of any process. Anton
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |