[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken dream of mine :(
From: |
Bas Wijnen |
Subject: |
Re: Broken dream of mine :( |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:58:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:19:06AM +0530, arnuld uttre wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Marcus Brinkmann
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > This is not true, at least for me. Confinement was a big discussion (for
> > political reasons), but it didn't affect my kernel choices (or lack thereof)
> > at all. It did influence my ideas for overall system design.
>
> After reading all archives of this month, I came to certain point but
> now your words have confused me.
...
> Now I wonder why Viengoos was created as an alternative if Coyotos was
> fine.
I don't know about Viengoos, but I do know about my own kernels. I did
not write them because there was something wrong with Coyotos. In fact,
I wrote them because I really liked the things Jonathan told about what
Coyotos would be like. However, Coyotos did not actually exist in a
working form. And nothing seemed to happen on the website. But I
wanted to play around with capabilities anyway. That is why I wrote my
first kernel.
Now I'm writing Iris because I liked writing a kernel, and I have a cool
target machine. :-)
Thanks,
Bas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Broken dream of mine :(, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/09/23
Re: Broken dream of mine :(, Marcus Brinkmann, 2009/09/29