[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++
From: |
Lluís |
Subject: |
Re: C++ |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:23:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
> You do have a point about the error messages though. It still shows
> that C++ was originally just a C preprocessor. Some errors can only be
> understood if you know how the feature is implemented.
You might find this interesting (motivation, 2nd paragraph):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concepts_(C%2B%2B)
Although this won't be shipped as stable anytime soon.
Lluis
--
"And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
something new, the whole world becomes that much richer."
-- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom
Tollbooth
- Re: C++, (continued)
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/11/05
- Re: C++, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/08
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, William Leslie, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Michal Suchanek, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Sam Mason, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, Sam Mason, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++,
Lluís <=
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/11/09
- Re: C++, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/10