[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Libre Business for the Planet
From: |
Thomas HARDING |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Libre Business for the Planet |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:01:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 |
On 17/04/2015 19:41, Logan Streondj wrote:
[...]
Even mostly "translated", any of flavour of is not a native
natural language but one more language to learn *completely*.
"C" language needs for 20 hours lessons regarding a book title
(I'm unsure it needs so short time to learn it). A little skills
are needed for Python, while structures are really obvious in the
last (indentation gives blocks), etc.
#english 50%+ of people be make fail simple program so common
program form be bad to learn for people from-source
'http://blog.codinghorror.com/separating-programming-sheep-from-non-programming-goats/'.
maybe SPEL form will-be more easy to learn.
[...]
What is pointed out here is : whatever language based or graphic based
programming method used, half of
people will fail to express "a fact" as "something formally expressed".
A part of simply then express that's
meaningless.
It seems 15% of human beings can't write any meaningfull sentence too,
whatever time and method spents
to learn (to write their own mother tongue).
I don't want to struggle against an effort to port a programming
language to "any mother tongue", I simply
says that's useless because most of who can do formal programming can
use a programming language
based on a lingua franca such as English. While using a lingua franca
not totally avoids collaboration
problem between programers foreigners one to the other
(EspeciallyDueToCamelNotationWhichIsCommonlyMotherTongueWritten).
best regards,
TSFH