libreplanet-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Libre Business for the Planet


From: Thomas HARDING
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Libre Business for the Planet
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:01:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0


On 17/04/2015 19:41, Logan Streondj wrote:
[...]

    Even mostly "translated", any of flavour of is not a native
    natural language but one more language to learn *completely*.

    "C" language needs for 20 hours lessons regarding a book title
    (I'm unsure it needs so short time to learn it). A little skills
    are needed for Python, while structures are really obvious in the
    last (indentation gives blocks), etc.


 #english 50%+ of people be  make fail simple program so common
 program form be  bad to learn for people from-source
'http://blog.codinghorror.com/separating-programming-sheep-from-non-programming-goats/'.
 maybe SPEL form will-be more easy to learn.

[...]

What is pointed out here is : whatever language based or graphic based programming method used, half of people will fail to express "a fact" as "something formally expressed". A part of simply then express that's
meaningless.

It seems 15% of human beings can't write any meaningfull sentence too, whatever time and method spents
to learn (to write their own mother tongue).

I don't want to struggle against an effort to port a programming language to "any mother tongue", I simply says that's useless because most of who can do formal programming can use a programming language based on a lingua franca such as English. While using a lingua franca not totally avoids collaboration
problem between programers foreigners one to the other
(EspeciallyDueToCamelNotationWhichIsCommonlyMotherTongueWritten).

best regards,
TSFH



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]