libreplanet-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New versio


From: Luke Shumaker
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:21:44 -0400
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.5 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:21:02 -0400,
André Silva wrote:
> On 06/12/2016 06:43 PM, fauno wrote:
> > Florencia Diaz <flodiaz81@riseup.net> writes:
> >> We are deciding by consensus that is good call it "Arch (the GNU/Linux 
> >> distribution)", not "Arch Linux". Even Richard Stallman is agree about 
> >> it, please no more fighting between us, we are part from the same 
> >> distribution and community.
> > 
> > +1 to the latest version [0] with arch called "arch (the gnu/linux
> > distribution)" which everyone seems to agree with
> > 
> > 
> > [0]: 
> > https://projects.parabola.nu/~lukeshu/social-contract.git/tree/Parabola_Social_Contract.md?h=proposals/lukeshu&id=89181428abb804ec94ed17b8732ff71540b01bdb
> 
> +1

Fine.

https://projects.parabola.nu/~lukeshu/social-contract.git/tree/Parabola_Social_Contract.md?h=proposals/lukeshu&id=1e4484a83d30ecbfa8592b336a7de27028425bcf

I put just "Arch" in the heading (because otherwise the heading was
just way too long, IMO) and "Arch (the GNU/Linux distrubtion)"
in the body.

I'm fine with this version passing.

Possible other changes:

 - The "democratic" thing.

 - I'm actually not super happy with the way I worded the Free Culture
   item.  The tone is different than the rest of the document.

-- 
Happy hacking,
~ Luke Shumaker



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]