Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] Misleading information in EOMA68 news

[Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic]

On 26.08.2016 19:27, Ali Razeen wrote:
> I follow your argument but to make sure we’re on the same page, let me try to 
> rephrase it in my own words so that you can agree or disagree. I believe you 
> claim that we cannot say that the EOMA68 is “libre hardware from the 
> beginning” because we have no proof that it has indeed been libre hardware 
> since the very beginning of the EOMA68 project (which would be T1, in your 
> email). Perhaps we can claim that “EOMA68 is libre hardware from the time the 
> hardware is shipped to its backers” when they eventually release their PCB 
> designs, or maybe we can claim “EOMA68 is libre hardware today” (which would 
> be T2) if they released the PCB today. But even if they did release it today, 
> we cannot claim that “EOMA68 is libre hardware from the beginning”.
> 
> Have I understood you correctly?

I think so.