Re: libtool.m4-mingw-lib-searchdirs-01.patch

[Robert Boehne]

Ouch is right, I should have seen that it was already done.  I was
attempting
to keep the patch queue down but it looks like I got a bit overzealous.

My bad!

Robert

Guido Draheim wrote:
> 
> Robert Boehne wrote:
> >
> > OK, I'm checking this in.
> >
> > Robert
> >
> 
> please no!
> 
>  I noticed later that it is a better idea to just use $PATH_SEPARATOR
>  in the last sed-part and make sure that this very variable does exist.
>  Currently it is implicitly done through initialisation order, but
>  one could even attach an AC_REQUIRE at the top of this very DEFUN.
>  I talked about it later on, and I did think that it would be done as
>  last communicated - see the last mail from Gary (!!!!!) that does also
>  contain `sed -e /-print-search-dirs/s,/;/,/$PATH_SEPARATOR/,` as the
>  proposed patching scheme - there's no more needed. The rest of what
>  there is in patch-01 happens to be just a bit overcautious, and
>  I don't think anymore that it is actually needed as such. The simple
>  patch has shown to be sufficient for quite a while now.
> 
>  What makes me wonder - Gary has already done the simple patch!!!!
>  - it is in version 1.202 of libtool.m4 - and the version 1.208 does
>  now contain a doubled patch about sys_lib searchdirs mingw fixup.
> 
>  Ouch, Guido
> 
>  P.S. Here's that patch that I did send named as patch-02 - apart
>  from what that sed-line above would do, it adds that AC_REQUIRE.
>  May be I'll better make up another one if anyone here feels that
>  adding AC_REQUIRE is a good thing. But as I see it - may be it
>  is a good thing to quickly remove that patch-01 that has gone on
>  top of Gary's 1.202 patching on the same topic. Sorry for all
>  the inconveniences....
>