[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: osf5.1 + cc + -pthread
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: osf5.1 + cc + -pthread |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:24:42 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:54:51PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:20:08PM CET:
> > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:52:47PM CET:
> > >
> > > Can someone give a second opinion on this? Whose patch is "better"?
> > > I'm obviously biased, so shouldn't decide. Some kind of fix is required
> > > though.
> >
> > I'll give it a try.
>
> Another thing I forgot (sorry):
>
> Both of your patches do non-intuitive things. Thus, both need more
> documentation as to what they do and why they do it.
Huh? libtool leaving off -pthread is non-intuitive.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)