Re: osf5.1 + cc + -pthread

[Peter O'Gorman]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I'll give it a try.

Thank you.

> Both tests fail if there ever is a case where $archive_expsyms_cmds uses
> a different linker driver than $archive_cmds.  This might be an academic
> issue.

I just had a quick look in libtool.m4 and didn't see anywhere that they are 
currently different. Does not imply that this will always be the case but I 
think it fairly safe.

> Other than that, after my proposed changes:
> - both patches have around the same size,
> - I like the "inclusion because of $CC" argument
> - but Albert's patch messes up the order of the arguments.
>   IIRC that's done anyway, right?

Yeah, there is then very little difference.

Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com