Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:21:40PM CEST:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > | lt_dlcaller_register takes zero args in branch-1-5, 2 in HEAD.

> > Looked at this (as it is a showstopper) and agree. Added api (perhaps
> > lt_dlcaller_set_iface(const char*,lt_dlhandle_interface *); or
> > something) to
> > set the info and remove the arguments here.
> > 
> > Gary?
> 
> So, I think the real problem is that LT_WITH_LTDL from libtool-2.0 will
> need to check for a libltdl that provides the lt_dlhandle_first function
> to make sure libtool-2.0 using apps get the libtool-2.0 version of
> libltdl...

Yes, this is an issue we cannot ignore for the release.

> And that falls in the remit of the LT_WITH_LTDL rewrite I'm working on
> at the moment.  Gah! :o)

Yep.

If it is too invasive to get LTDL_INIT user-exportable and user-usable
at the moment, I may even be convinced to offer the new non-subpackage
feature post 2.0 only (maybe in a followup minor release even).  I know
Bob will hate me for this, :)  but 2.0 is needed badly for a number of
other features as well, which IMVHO seem to work now.  I'm open to
arguments, surely this is an area where we should reach consensus.

If LT_WITH_LTDL worked nicely, I'd be happy enough.  :)

Cheers,
Ralf