[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:21:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) |
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> | lt_dlcaller_register takes zero args in branch-1-5, 2 in HEAD.
> | This sucks. CVS HEAD m4 wants two args, but does not test for this
> | (and thus loves to use an installed ltdl from branch-1-5 over its own
> | convenience one from HEAD).
> |
> | We need to kill this in order to avoid being backward incompatible.
> | I can only hope no packages other than m4 depend on this already. :(
>
> Looked at this (as it is a showstopper) and agree. Added api (perhaps
> lt_dlcaller_set_iface(const char*,lt_dlhandle_interface *); or
> something) to
> set the info and remove the arguments here.
>
> Gary?
So, I think the real problem is that LT_WITH_LTDL from libtool-2.0 will
need to check for a libltdl that provides the lt_dlhandle_first function
to make sure libtool-2.0 using apps get the libtool-2.0 version of
libltdl...
And that falls in the remit of the LT_WITH_LTDL rewrite I'm working on
at the moment. Gah! :o)
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Charles Wilson, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy [was more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD], Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18