|
From: | Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: | Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry |
Date: | Wed, 17 May 2006 16:11:46 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello,
Howdy!
* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST:The following patch addresses http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX. Patch against HEAD.This patch is missing a documentation update (doc/libtool.texi).
I'll commit one presently.
I'm not sure whether it should be backported, probably not.
Looks like a new feature to me... no backport rqd imho.
Does the testsuite pass with this?
It passes on my Gentoo and Tiger laptops. I believe Albert has seen no regressions on his architectures (judging by the related testsuite patch).
2006-05-16 Albert Chin-A-Young <address@hidden> * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh, libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS, _LT_LANG_CXX_CONFIG, _LT_LANG_F77_CONFIG,_LT_LANG_FC_CONFIG) [ aix4*, aix5*, hpux10*, hpux11* ]: Introduce a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, whichwould ignore hardcode_direct=yes if the result would create a static library dependency. Static library dependencies are immune to $shlibpath_var.
Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net GNU Hacker / )= http://trac.azazil.net/projects/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |