[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 17:17:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:11:46PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST:
> >
> >>The following patch addresses
> >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I
> >>added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if
> >>hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This
> >>impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX.
> >This patch is missing a documentation update (doc/libtool.texi).
>
> I'll commit one presently.
Thanks. It would be great if you could explain that "static library
dependency" does _not_ have to do with static libraries at all -- what
a confusing name IMHO! Maybe we should think of a better one. Is that
what HP-UX is using in their documentation?
> >I'm not sure whether it should be backported, probably not.
>
> Looks like a new feature to me... no backport rqd imho.
Fine with me.
Cheers,
Ralf
Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry, Albert Chin, 2006/05/17