Re: withGCC unset

[Peter O'Gorman]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:08:58PM CET:
>> This patch should fix issues with withGCC.
>>
>> Ok for HEAD?
> 
> My only issue with this is: are there situations where we may need to
> know both whether the current tag compiler is from GCC, and the C
> compiler is gcc, at the same time?  Or: whether any of the tests that
> currently use $GCC or $withGCC, actually need to know what the C
> compiler is.

I do not think this is the case, however it does lead to my next (rather
more controversial patch).

The only place where this might occur is in _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER,
which we call for every tag, but which sets no tag specific variables.

I would like to reduce this to just one call to _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER
for the default tag.

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com