Re: withGCC unset

[Peter O'Gorman]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:36:48AM CET:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:08:58PM CET:
>>>> This patch should fix issues with withGCC.
>>>>
>>>> Ok for HEAD?
>>> My only issue with this is: are there situations where we may need to
>>> know both whether the current tag compiler is from GCC, and the C
>>> compiler is gcc, at the same time?  Or: whether any of the tests that
>>> currently use $GCC or $withGCC, actually need to know what the C
>>> compiler is.
>> I do not think this is the case, however it does lead to my next (rather
>> more controversial patch).
> 
> Intended before 2.2?

Does not have to be (similarly, this one could be considered cosmetic,
and wait 'til after 2.2 - I'll leave that up to you).

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com