RE: hppa-hpux DESTDIR support.

[Duft Markus]

> 
> >
> > Duft Markus wrote:
> >
> > > But anyway, for me right now small side effects or very special
> > > special-cases would not matter that much. It would be much more
> > > important to get DESTDIR to work. However it would still be more
> than
> > > cool to get DESTDIR support in upstream libtool, without having to
> > apply
> > > patches, that the authors don't like :)
> >
> > You did not post a patch. How could we dislike it? :)
> 
> Huh, i attached ot to the first mail... it is there at the copy I
> received from the list, maybe your spam filter or something like that?
> Whatever: here's my first post with attachment: http://www.mail-
> archive.com/address@hidden/msg04111.html
> 
> >
> > Patches that do more good than harm are likely to be accepted.
> 
> That's exactly the point i'm unsure about, if I do more harm than good
> or the other way round :) of course, for _me_ I do more good, but does
> it harm others that the hardcode test fails now?
> 
> BTW. I didn't mention it I think, but I commented some lines in the
> patch out which I added to ltmain.sh. it seems they don't make much
> difference, although I though they should make a difference if a link
> has no rpaths set, in which case rpath_sepc wouldn't be resolved, and
> thus +s is not added to the command line. I would need another place
to
> add +s somewhere... Ideas?
> 
> Cheers, Markus
> 
> >
> > Peter
> > --
> > Peter O'Gorman
> > http://pogma.com
> >