Re: hppa-hpux DESTDIR support.

[Peter O'Gorman]

Duft Markus wrote:

>>> Patches that do more good than harm are likely to be accepted.
>> That's exactly the point i'm unsure about, if I do more harm than good
>> or the other way round :) of course, for _me_ I do more good, but does
>> it harm others that the hardcode test fails now?

Sorry, don't know how I missed that patch, still, it strikes me as more
of a hack than a solution (and what is with the commented case
statements being added to ltmain.m4sh?).

I'm not even sure how much +s is relevant here, you are changing the
hardcode_minus_L to no, surely that is having the largest effect on your
DESTDIR installs, not the +s changes?

This patch is not acceptable as is, sorry.

By the way, do you see DESTDIR installs failing for every package on
hppa-hp-hpux systems?

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com