[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions
|
From: |
Charles Wilson |
|
Subject: |
Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:42:21 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Yup, indeed. And we need to provide a throw()-qualified destructor as
> well.
A word of warning: not all implementations of std::exception use the
'throw' specifier on the virtual what() method. So, if you add it on
your derived class but the base class doesn't have it, you may get
[errors|warnings|pain].
Not sure what to do about it, short of adding a configure test...
--
Chuck
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/09
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/09
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/10
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/10
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/11
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions,
Charles Wilson <=
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Tim Rice, 2010/01/12