[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions
From: |
Tim Rice |
Subject: |
Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:10:03 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > OTOH, pre-standard C++ compilers are definitely a concern for testing.
> > I usually do pre-release testing on a couple of systems that have fairly
> > old and non-standard C++ compilers (no namespaces etc). I don't want to
> > see errors stemming from this.
>
> I have not encountered such a limited C++ compiler for at least 12 years,
> including on archaic systems.
Just be aware that there are currently shipping systems based on
a product first released in 1992. I'm refering to OpenServer 5.0.7.
Its native C++ compiler uses an old AT&T Cfront front end to the C compiler.
--
Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469
address@hidden
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/09
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/09
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/10
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/10
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/11
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Charles Wilson, 2010/01/11
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/01/12
- Re: libtool, llvm-gcc, failing C++ exceptions,
Tim Rice <=