[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add missing sysroot resolution
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add missing sysroot resolution |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Oct 2010 10:59:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:55:44AM CEST:
> On 10/09/2010 10:51 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:43:12AM CEST:
> >>I'm applying this patch since it's pretty obvious.
> >Is this fixing (part) of the reported bug?
>
> Lionel pointed us to the patch, so I assumed it fixed all of it. I
> still haven't built his stuff. It looks really interesting, as does
> OpenEmbedded, and it's really cool that the sysroot feature is
> already getting this much exposure. I was worried that it would
> remain confined in the "unused feature" limbo and would bitrot.
>
> It's also nice because it shows that these people _are_
> autoreconfing/relibtoolizing as part of their build systems. It
> gives me much more confidence on the backwards-compatibility of
> libtool 2.4!
Indeed! Good you say this (all of the above), because I forgot to
mention any of it.
> >Do you know how to expose it, so we can cover it in the testsuite?
>
> Not yet, I'll look into it next week. I need to build Lionel's
> recipe and then distill a testcase.
Cool. Thanks.
> >For future sysroot patches, feel free to also (or first) commit them to
> >the sysroot branch and merge them to master.
>
> Ok, I was undecided about the status of the sysroot branch.
Oh, I don't care much either way, but as long as we're still fixing
things with, might as well document the fixes on the branch. For some
kind of future code-archeology niceness or so. ;-)
Cheers,
Ralf