libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Add missing sysroot resolution


From: Lionel Landwerlin
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing sysroot resolution
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:31:02 +0200

Le samedi 09 octobre 2010 à 10:55 +0200, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 10/09/2010 10:51 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:43:12AM CEST:
> >> I'm applying this patch since it's pretty obvious.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Is this fixing (part) of the reported bug?
> 
> Lionel pointed us to the patch, so I assumed it fixed all of it.  I 
> still haven't built his stuff.  It looks really interesting, as does 
> OpenEmbedded, and it's really cool that the sysroot feature is already 
> getting this much exposure.  I was worried that it would remain confined 
> in the "unused feature" limbo and would bitrot.
> 
> It's also nice because it shows that these people _are_ 
> autoreconfing/relibtoolizing as part of their build systems.  It gives 
> me much more confidence on the backwards-compatibility of libtool 2.4!
> 
> > Do you know how to expose it, so we can cover it in the testsuite?
> 
> Not yet, I'll look into it next week.  I need to build Lionel's recipe 
> and then distill a testcase.
> 
> > For future sysroot patches, feel free to also (or first) commit them to
> > the sysroot branch and merge them to master.
> 
> Ok, I was undecided about the status of the sysroot branch.
> 

Hi,

Paolo, I'm sorry if I made you though this patch was fixing my problem
(in fact after a quick test, it does not). I just wanted to point it
out, because Openembedded like buildroot, are projects which try to
crosscompile source packages. I though it might be a good start to
investigate the problem.

And yes, I personally prefer to autoreconf/libtoolize packages rather
than patching a generated libtool script :)

Regards,

--
Lionel Landwerlin





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]