Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3338 in lilypond: spacing after 2.17.13 is much looser

[lilypond]

Comment #10 on issue 3338 by address@hidden: spacing after 2.17.13 is  
much looser
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3338

I first tried amending the patch linked to issue 3160, but did not see a  
way to distinguish between
 1) a temporary staff being absent on a particular line-broken system (this  
issue)
 2) a dynamics context completely  (issue 1669)
Each of these can re-appear on later lines, with another forte mark or  
\context Staff="ossia"{..}

The patch linked to issue 3160 includes the requested baseline-skip  
allowance associated with the staff or dynamics line, even when empty.  We  
do not want that allowance for the ossia staff, and neither for the  
dynamics in issue 1669, actually.

Probably better to fix 1669 in the other direction: consistently skip the  
spacing allowance for lines that have no graphical elements at all.  I do  
have an updated patch linked to issue 1669, that has all the good  
simplifications we found when working on the patch linked to issue 3160.


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings