Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3338 in lilypond: spacing after 2.17.13 is much looser

[lilypond]

Comment #13 on issue 3338 by address@hidden: spacing after 2.17.13 is  
much looser
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3338

Neither the ossia staff, nor the dynamics line from issue 1669, have any  
graphical objects at all in the systems where they are having space allowed  
inconsistently.  So there are no stencils to have directional emptiness.

Also, such lines do not 'separate' skylines if there is gap.  In general,  
notes can protrude through a line of dynamics
<<\new Staff {g'4 g' g g'}
  \new Dynamics {s4\p s s s\f}
  \new Staff {\clef bass g4 g' g g} >>

The question is whether the empty line should advance the ideal position of  
staves to follow, according to the the staff-spacing parameters.  Mike and  
I independently decided empty lines should count for advancing the ideal  
staff position, but maybe only due to the sneaky way they were being  
skipped in (some places in) the code.   The example of this issue makes it  
clear that we should *not* advance staff postiions after an ossia staff  
when it is absent, and skipping the advancement would work for issue 1669  
as well, if it is done consistently.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings