[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Verifying fixes?
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Verifying fixes? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:10:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.36.1 |
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 17:26 +0000 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
> As I was reviewing Jonas's test review environment on GitLab, I noticed that
> there were tons of closed issues that had not been verified.
>
> I went back and looked on SourceForge, and found that we have 587 issues that
> are listed with status of Fixed and do not have the label Fixed_2_21_1 (which
> has not yet been released, so they cannot be verified).
>
> I think our long delay between releases as we worked out the bugs in our
> release system got us out of the habit of Verifying the fixes.
>
> Do you believe we should Verify the fixes, or should we just leave the issues
> closed without verification? I'm willing to spend some time doing the
> verification, if we think it's valuable to do so.
So what does "Verify" mean, making sure that the bug is indeed fixed?
(I can't imagine how this makes sense for patches.)
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part