[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond |
Date: |
Tue, 5 May 2020 18:07:50 -0400 |
On May 5, 2020, at 17:48, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> One thing here is that being under control of a wrapper, one can use
> unchecked unsmobs.
This is a good idea. I considered this briefly, but I wanted to focus first on
making it natural to deal robustly with potentially improper or heterogeneous
lists coming from a user, and leave optimizing more restrictive cases for later.
—
Dan
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, (continued)
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Hans Åberg, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Dan Eble, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Dan Eble, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Dan Eble, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Carl Sorensen, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond,
Dan Eble <=