[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond |
Date: |
Tue, 5 May 2020 18:40:07 -0400 |
On May 5, 2020, at 18:03, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> If everything can be represented/mapped in similar manner, the Scheme
> garbage collector does not need any interaction with user-written code
> for doing its job.
I would not like to see the STL go, but if the getting rid of all the explicit
GC code is the other side of it, it might be worth it.
—
Dan
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, (continued)
Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Hans Åberg, 2020/05/05
Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Dan Eble, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Dan Eble, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, David Kastrup, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Carl Sorensen, 2020/05/05
- Re: Almost, but not quite: C++ STL in LilyPond, Dan Eble, 2020/05/05