[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Maybe version should be mandatory
From: |
David Raleigh Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: Maybe version should be mandatory |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:19:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
On Friday 17 December 2004 09:34 am, Michael Kallas wrote:
> Would it maybe make sense to make \version
> numbers in the .ly files mandatory?
> Or at least have some --Wall / --strict feature
> that fails if it is not set?
> That way, you would't forget to insert the version
> and have to learn the hard way after years
> that it would have been good to do so for compiling
> with a different version.
That's really a very good idea. Lilypond could fail
if there were no \version and warn if the version
were incorrect in some way. daveA
- Maybe version should be mandatory, Michael Kallas, 2004/12/17
- Re: Maybe version should be mandatory,
David Raleigh Arnold <=
- Re: Maybe version should be mandatory, Erik Sandberg, 2004/12/17
- Re: Maybe version should be mandatory, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/12/18
- Re: Maybe version should be mandatory, Michael Kallas, 2004/12/20
- betweensystemspace, David Raleigh Arnold, 2004/12/20
- Re: betweensystemspace, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/12/21
- Re: betweensystemspace, Karl Hammar, 2004/12/23
- Re: betweensystemspace, David Raleigh Arnold, 2004/12/23
- Re: betweensystemspace, Karl Hammar, 2004/12/28
- Re: betweensystemspace, David Raleigh Arnold, 2004/12/28