|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 |
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 14:17:15 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
Am 24.05.2012 14:14, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 24/05/12 21:19, address@hidden wrote:On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:Still a regression. Any change in behavior that is not fully accounted for in the change log and that you feel leads to worse behavior than a previous version is a regression. People can then either report it as a change, at which point it is a feature, or they can fix it, at which point the old functionality is restored.Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:Just one comment, a question that I had several times when reading such reports.On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not beamed with the others: \relative c'' { \time 3/4 c8 c c c c c r c c c c c }It apparently is different from 2.14.2, but I would not call this a regression. In 3/4, I would like to have 6 eights beamed together, but if any rests are involved, the beaming should be per quarter in order to preserve the 3-beat character. In: \relative c'' { \time 3/4 r4 r8 c c c }the default beaming in 2.14.2 gives an impression of a 2-beat, which shouldbe avoided. Toine Schreurs _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-userDon't know if this applies here, but:A regression is something that doesn't work in a later version and that has _deliberately_ worked in a previous version. I.e. something that has once been fixed to work in that specific way. If it just was correct and isn't anymore, it isn't considered a regression but just a newly introduced bug.Best UrsReverting to the previous behaviour is simply a matter of \set beamExceptions = #'((end . (((1 . 8) . (6))))) Nick _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Well, not having followed this too closely:I have the impression that you experience an effect or side effect of the heavily changed beaming.
It this is the case, could you please check if this is documented? Maybe you overlooked something.
Or maybe there's need for a documentations suggestion? Best Urs
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |