[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2 |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2012 20:56:01 +0200 |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> Looks to me like a bug in 2.14.2. Beaming 5 quavers together doesn't give
> much clue to the beat pattern?
+1, 2.14 behavior seems wrong to me.
BTW, Ted Ross says "in 3/4, [...] notes on the second beat can be
beamed with notes on the third beat" and gives example with f8[ g] a[
g f g]. Unfortunately, there's no example with rest like ours.
cheers,
Janek
Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2, Colin Hall, 2012/05/24