[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 48 and 72 ET
From: |
mskala |
Subject: |
Re: 48 and 72 ET |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:05:23 -0600 (CST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LNX 67 2015-01-07) |
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, David Kastrup wrote:
> I'll stick with my "that doesn't even make sense" verdict, thank you
> very much.
Don't ask the question if you're going to attack the answer. Your
contributions to LilyPond development don't excuse you from practicing
basic civility.
--
Matthew Skala
address@hidden People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, (continued)
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Urs Liska, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET,
mskala <=
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Simon Albrecht, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, mskala, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10