[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 48 and 72 ET
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: 48 and 72 ET |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:28:49 +0100 |
> On 10 Feb 2017, at 00:34, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Am 10.02.2017 um 00:22 schrieb Hans Åberg:
>>> So is there any reason people don't use convert-ly when upgrading to a
>>> newer version?
>>>
>> For libraries, you would want to keep track of the changes, but running
>> convert-ly and do a diff is a good suggestion. Though doing it by hand was
>> quicker, as I remembered the issue and which files needed to be fixed.
>>
>> In general, though, perhaps people maybe do not think or know about it, so
>> the process might be automated.
>>
>>
>
> When maintaining libraries one should want to make them compatible with
> multiple LilyPond versions, IMO at least with the current stable and devel
> version, but depending on the use case and target audience one might even
> support the previous stable release.
> In order to be able to do that in openLilyLib I created the version
> comparison operators/predicates
> (https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/blob/master/internal/lilypond-version-predicates.scm)
> which make it easy to write switches based on the currently run LilyPond
> version.
>
> I intend to create a patch to include this functionality into LilyPond, but
> so far I'm not really sure *where* these functions should be defined and
> where they could adequately be documented.
For regular.ly, Graham made it originally for an earlier LilyPond version only.
I then was able to make it for latest LilyPond, but not updating it. But now,
it works for latest LilyPond again. So there a certain span of versions, here.
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, (continued)
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Urs Liska, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, mskala, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Simon Albrecht, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09