[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 48 and 72 ET
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: 48 and 72 ET |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:58:34 +0100 |
> On 10 Feb 2017, at 10:58, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> On 10 Feb 2017, at 10:24, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>>> On 10 Feb 2017, at 00:39, address@hidden wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>>>> enthused. Why wouldn't we want to have best practices pointed out and
>>>>>> promoted on the user list?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best practices do not include attacking other list users.
>>>>
>>>> It is the human interface part that is amiss.
>>>
>>> Don't hold your breath for a timely revamp.
>>
>> So then you'll have to accept that people don't use convert-ly. :-)
>
> I don't _deny_ that people don't use convert-ly but I don't need to
> _accept_ it. Where would be the point in any work if you'll instead
> "have to accept" that the work isn't done before you start with it?
You don't have to accept that the sun is rising every day, but it won't change
a thing.
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, (continued)
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, mskala, 2017/02/09
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, Hans Åberg, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET, David Kastrup, 2017/02/10
- Re: 48 and 72 ET,
Hans Åberg <=
Re: 48 and 72 ET, Thomas Richter, 2017/02/10