[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: postscript printers for lilypond
From: |
karl |
Subject: |
Re: postscript printers for lilypond |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:48:45 +0100 (CET) |
David:
> address@hidden writes:
>
> > I'm looking for a new printer since the old one was fried by the
> > lighting (i.e. the thunder thing, not light in the room).
>
> That doesn't help at all regarding your question, but the thunder thing
> is called "lightning" unlike the light in the room.
Sigh, why do the english spell thoose two so like each other.
> > It seems that colour lasers are all glossy and some b/w one too.
> > Inkjet, e.g. HP pagewide and WF-C8190DTW are superbly matte but their
> > blacks don't cover the area (there are small white dots all over) and
> > the edges are irregular, not sharp. The Kyocera TASKalfa is superbly
> > sharp but the blacks gives glare in the wrong light (as it always are)
> > and it don't handle lilyponds postscript.
>
> "it don't handle lilyponds postscript" according to which test?
Sending it to the printer gave me a surplus of waste paper - so I kind
of turned off error reports in the printer after that.
> I just
> recently removed a Ghostscriptism (using max/mix operators) that would
> have made regular PostScript interpreters barf. Maybe that's fixed in
> master now?
I'll try that, though there where some problems with the guile version
and some fonts last time I compiled lilypond.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
Re: postscript printers for lilypond, karl, 2019/01/28
Re: postscript printers for lilypond, David Kastrup, 2019/01/27
Re: postscript printers for lilypond,
karl <=
Re: postscript printers for lilypond, Andrew Bernard, 2019/01/27