Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?

[Henry Nelson]

> checking.  Before I sift through the #ifdef soup (I like that line),
> does anyone have issues/arguments against more compiletime options?
> 
> Perhaps it should even default to be disabled -- I expect several

ALL recent "features" should be off by default.  Definitely, all
so-called "features" should have compiletime options.  When something
can't be turned off, it requires delving into the code.

Lynx is getting way too big.  Lynx is no longer a valid option on a
limited resource machine.  The real problem is that the code only grows.
In the last two years, I don't recall the binary being smaller than the
previously installed one.  It only gets bigger.

__Henry