[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c
From: |
Thorsten Glaser |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:18:40 +0000 (UTC) |
David Woolley dixit:
> may use heuristics.
Interestingly enough, the BOM is actually a _standardised_ heuristics.
If it begins with a {UTF-8,UCS-[24][BL]E} BOM, and the subsequent
text does not contain any encoding errors, consider it of that
encoding.
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
- [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Halsz Sndor, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thomas Dickey, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thorsten Glaser, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thomas Dickey, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, David Woolley, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c,
Thorsten Glaser <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thomas Dickey, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thorsten Glaser, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Halsz Sndor, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thorsten Glaser, 2009/02/27
Message not available
Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, David Woolley, 2009/02/27