[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c
From: |
Thorsten Glaser |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:17:02 +0000 (UTC) |
Thomas Dickey dixit:
>Lynx assumes the document charset is ISO-8859-1 if it's not given.
This is wrong.
Lynx assumes the document charset, if it’s not given, is the one
set forth in /etc/lynx.cfg:ASSUME_LOCAL_CHARSET.
>(That was the rule for some time - for HTML - perhaps we're not
>discussing HTML anymore).
The X*ML rule is UTF-8 for unlabelled content, though.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
- [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Halsz Sndor, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thomas Dickey, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thorsten Glaser, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thomas Dickey, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, David Woolley, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thorsten Glaser, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thomas Dickey, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c,
Thorsten Glaser <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Halsz Sndor, 2009/02/26
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, Thorsten Glaser, 2009/02/27
Message not available
Re: [Lynx-dev] Unicode-marking, &c, David Woolley, 2009/02/27