[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4 |
Date: |
Tue, 26 May 2009 22:42:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302) |
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On the other hand, you might make a constructive remark,
suggesting how to deal with the existing discrimination.
There really is no solution in the long term, as I don't think you will
ever convince commercial web site designers of the true concept behind
HTML, so they will always only be interested in the mass market GUI
browsers.
The problem is that avoidance techniques are only short term fixes,
hiding the real problem, which is not a technical problem.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4, David Woolley, 2009/05/26
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4, Halász Sándor, 2009/05/26
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4, David Woolley, 2009/05/27
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4, Stefan Caunter, 2009/05/26
RE: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4, Larson, Timothy E., 2009/05/26