|
From: | Krzysztof Żelechowski |
Subject: | Re: [Lynx-dev] http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/ |
Date: | Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:18:37 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 |
Użytkownik Thomas Dickey napisał:
That is true; however, for the time being, and assuming that Lynx has the right not to handle XML (except that Lynx should display XML as text/plain unless the DOCTYPE says it is XHTML, recognising which in theory requires an XML reader but I believe it can be done with a regular expression for the typical case), it is the server that must be patched to cater to Lynx. I was mainly trying to elicit your opinion on the mechanism that could be used server-side to achieve that. (And it is not just about WebSVN, but about any server that sends XML to the client.) Regarding a possible patch, it is significantly easier to support XML than to support Javascript because the latter is an interactive programming environment while the former is merely a preprocessor. Would you prefer linking to libxml2, dynamically loading libxml2 or using xsltproc as an external tool?On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:02:49PM +0100, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:Użytkownik Thomas Dickey napisał:On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Å»elechowski wrote:Do you refer to any server, or WebSVN in particular? Because it obviously need not be so, and, given the proper request headers are provided, it would be a bug in the server script.patches welcome ;-) bye.Patches to what? To WebSVN? Do you happen to be the development manager there as well?Lynx, of course. You have several times indicated that you see a place where Lynx should be improved.
Thanks, Chris
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |