[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps
From: |
Mark Skilbeck |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:45:05 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:34:04PM -0500, Keith Bowes wrote:
> Je 2012-Jan-11 je 20:01, Mark Skilbeck skribis:
> > Ola, fellow text-lovers.
> >
> > After using Lynx for the past couple of days, I've come to the conclusion
> > that
> > text-browsers are the only worthy browsers! Thank you for your work. With
> > that
> > said, there is an improvement (subjective opinion, o'course!) I would like
> > to
> > see accepted into the code, and that is the ability to supply some content
> > to
> > Jump URLs. For example, if I have a Jump defined as:
> >
> > <dd>dgg<dt><a href="http://duckduckgo.com/?s=%s">DuckDuckGo search</a>,
> >
> > a call then to the "ddg" Jump with the extra text "lynx web browser", would
> > be
> > expanded as follows:
> >
> > http://duckduckgo.com/?s=lynx+web+browser,
> >
> > with proper URL-encoding (Percent-encoding) applied.
> >
>
> Yeah, I've thought that myself, to make jumps work more like Mozilla's
> bookmark keywords (which AFAIK, originated in IE 5). I've always
> figured that the developers don't want such code bloat; they've
> addressed this in the issue, that a feature should only be available if
> there's a consensus.
It would be useful, no? Well, I think it shouldn't be a problem to include if we
can agree on the best implementation. Currently, I think the best option is:
1. Search jump URL for "%s";
2. If found, prompt for input;
3. Substitute %s with input;
4. Go!
It might even be worth storing a boolean in the JumpDatum structure when loading
the jumps to speed-up repeated uses of jumps.
- mgsk.
- [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/14
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/14
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/15
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/15
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/16