[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:11:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:45:05PM +0000, Mark Skilbeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:34:04PM -0500, Keith Bowes wrote:
> > Je 2012-Jan-11 je 20:01, Mark Skilbeck skribis:
> > > Ola, fellow text-lovers.
> > >
> > > After using Lynx for the past couple of days, I've come to the conclusion
> > > that
> > > text-browsers are the only worthy browsers! Thank you for your work. With
> > > that
> > > said, there is an improvement (subjective opinion, o'course!) I would
> > > like to
> > > see accepted into the code, and that is the ability to supply some
> > > content to
> > > Jump URLs. For example, if I have a Jump defined as:
> > >
> > > <dd>dgg<dt><a href="http://duckduckgo.com/?s=%s">DuckDuckGo search</a>,
> > >
> > > a call then to the "ddg" Jump with the extra text "lynx web browser",
> > > would be
> > > expanded as follows:
> > >
> > > http://duckduckgo.com/?s=lynx+web+browser,
> > >
> > > with proper URL-encoding (Percent-encoding) applied.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, I've thought that myself, to make jumps work more like Mozilla's
> > bookmark keywords (which AFAIK, originated in IE 5). I've always
> > figured that the developers don't want such code bloat; they've
> > addressed this in the issue, that a feature should only be available if
> > there's a consensus.
>
> It would be useful, no? Well, I think it shouldn't be a problem to include if
> we
> can agree on the best implementation. Currently, I think the best option is:
>
> 1. Search jump URL for "%s";
> 2. If found, prompt for input;
> 3. Substitute %s with input;
> 4. Go!
>
> It might even be worth storing a boolean in the JumpDatum structure when
> loading
> the jumps to speed-up repeated uses of jumps.
perhaps. If it's something that's run once per user interaction,
it's likely to be so small that no one can measure it.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/14
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/14
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Mark Skilbeck, 2012/01/15
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/15
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/16
- Re: [Lynx-dev] A possible modification to Jumps, Thomas Dickey, 2012/01/16