[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ag Ibragimov] Re: Collaborative editing.
From: |
Ian Kelling |
Subject: |
Re: [Ag Ibragimov] Re: Collaborative editing. |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:55:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.7.0; emacs 28.0.50 |
Yes. I will look into it. Thanks for reporting.
Ag Ibragimov <agzam.ibragimov@gmail.com> writes:
> For some strange reason, emacs-devel emails are no longer searchable by
> their message-ids in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/
>
> Interestingly, emacs-org-mode archive works fine. Could someone please
> check why they are no longer searchable. Thanks!
>
> From: Ag Ibragimov <agzam.ibragimov@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Collaborative editing.
> To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 01:32:40 -0500 (1 week, 5 days, 10 hours ago)
> Flags: seen, list
> Maildir: /INBOX
> List: mailman.gnu.org
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:43:25 -0400
>>> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
>>>
>>> Anyone have thoughts on how one could get Emacs to be a really top
>>> flight collaborative editing environment, especially for programmers?
>>
>> I suggest to search the archives of this list for "collaborative",
>> there were a few large discussions last year. One of the latest
>> attempts to add these capabilities to Emacs is here:
>>
>> https://code.librehq.com/qhong/crdt.el/
>
> Sorry for so nonchalantly changing the subject, but speaking of
> searching the archives. Since not too long ago I've been having trouble
> searching using "field-specified searching", i.e., using the +subject, or
> +from, and most importantly - using +message-id operator.
>
> I have a function that allows me to find the current email thread in the
> archives
> using email's message-id; basically, it calls
> (notmuch-show-get-message-id); then launches https://lists.gnu.org
> and tries to search with a search string like this:
>
> +message-id:<YRiqQ7auhgw8LW0z@protected.localdomain>
>
> And it used to work, but at some point, it stopped working, and that's
> annoying. I've been helplessly shaking my fist whenever I try to find a thread
> in the archives, but other than that, I have no idea how to cope with
> this.
>
> Does anyone know what's changed, why the search doesn't work as before
> anymore?
>
> ----------
>
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: Search for message-id (was: Collaborative editing.)
> To: Ag Ibragimov <agzam.ibragimov@gmail.com>
> Cc: perry@piermont.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:56:41 +0300
> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:56:41 +0300 (1 week, 5 days, 4 hours ago)
> Flags: seen, list
> Maildir: /INBOX
> List: mailman.gnu.org
>
>> From: Ag Ibragimov <agzam.ibragimov@gmail.com>
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 01:32:40 -0500
>>
>> Sorry for so nonchalantly changing the subject
>
> Please in the future actually change the Subject when you do so. (I
> did it now.)
>
>> but speaking of
>> searching the archives. Since not too long ago I've been having trouble
>> searching using "field-specified searching", i.e., using the +subject, or
>> +from, and most importantly - using +message-id operator.
>>
>> I have a function that allows me to find the current email thread in the
>> archives
>> using email's message-id; basically, it calls
>> (notmuch-show-get-message-id); then launches https://lists.gnu.org
>> and tries to search with a search string like this:
>>
>> +message-id:<YRiqQ7auhgw8LW0z@protected.localdomain>
>>
>> And it used to work, but at some point, it stopped working, and that's
>> annoying. I've been helplessly shaking my fist whenever I try to find a
>> thread
>> in the archives, but other than that, I have no idea how to cope with
>> this.
>>
>> Does anyone know what's changed, why the search doesn't work as before
>> anymore?
>
> My guess is that this has something to do with the changes done in
> configuration of mailman-managed GNU mailing lists to avoid the DKIM
> lunacy, which I think also gave us the "[External]" prefixes and
> mangled From addresses.
>
> But the right place to ask this is not here, it is by sending them to
> these two addresses:
>
> mailman@gnu.org
> sysadmin@gnu.org
> ----------