[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] bundled libs
From: |
Lapo Luchini |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] bundled libs |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:44:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0 Hamster/2.0.0.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi there.
(this would be "silly question #3")
OK, disk space is cheap, but I was wondering... why building
(exclusively) with a bundled popt, a bundled LUA, a bundled sqlite and a
bundled botan?
All of three have got critical flaws whose patches were not accepted
upstream?
Or "just to be on the safe side"?
Personally I much prefer to use shared libraries instead of big static
build, I guess it's a matter of taste, but I was wondering if there was
any "strong" reason behind it.
- --
L a p o L u c h i n i
l a p o @ l a p o . i t
w w w . l a p o . i t /
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkN/AgsACgkQaJiCLMjyUvtUIgCdFs/BGXx1Jau+ud0GKutGE4fh
xZgAoPdGmU0880TeOVFMVn+JazV3BwHX
=BpkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Monotone-devel] bundled libs,
Lapo Luchini <=