[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions
From: |
Gour D. |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:21:34 +0200 |
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:01:20 +0200
>>>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Georgi wrote:
Patrick> What currently works is to manually collect relevant packets
Patrick> (revisions, files, certs) for explicitely given revs - that
Patrick> could be automated some more, but I think the consensus is to
Patrick> use patches instead (even if they lose some information) -
Patrick> they're much more approachable for humans.
Yeah, I'm aware of it, but asked considering that it was mentioned
that packets are going to become deprecated in 1.0.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG: CDBF17CA
--
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, (continued)
- [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Gour D., 2010/08/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Thomas Keller, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, John Bailey, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Thomas Keller, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, John Bailey, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Stephen Leake, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, John Bailey, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Stephen Leake, 2010/08/12
- [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Hendrik Boom, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Ethan Blanton, 2010/08/12
- [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions,
Gour D. <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: removal of packet functions, Gour D., 2010/08/10