[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development
From: |
Peter Galbraith |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development |
Date: |
Wed, 11 May 2005 10:13:52 -0400 |
K Suominen <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'd like to see nmh survive as well, but I'm already one of those who
> migrated to another mail client (mutt) due to the increased amount of
> MIME mail. It was the multipart PGP signatures that finally did it
> for me.
As a note of interest, it's likely that MH-E can address all your modern
needs and still use nmh. Of course, it involves using Emacs too.
http://mh-e.sourceforge.net/
Peter
- [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, K Suominen, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development,
Peter Galbraith <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/11
- [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Bill Wohler, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/12
- [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Neil W Rickert, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10