[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development |
Date: |
Wed, 11 May 2005 16:03:26 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.mail.nmh.devel as well.
Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:13:52AM -0400, Peter Galbraith wrote:
>> As a note of interest, it's likely that MH-E can address all your
>> modern needs and still use nmh. Of course, it involves using Emacs
>> too.
>>
>> http://mh-e.sourceforge.net/
>
> *shiver*
Hi Chad, I don't quite read that. Should I be laughing, crying, or
smiling contently? ;-)
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
- [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Josh Bressers, 2005/05/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Oliver Kiddle, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, K Suominen, 2005/05/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Peter Galbraith, 2005/05/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/11
- [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development,
Bill Wohler <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2005/05/12
- [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Chad Walstrom, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Neil W Rickert, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Paul Fox, 2005/05/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was "nmh current development"), Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development, Ken Hornstein, 2005/05/10