[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Alas, No nmh in RedHat 4
From: |
Josh Bressers |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Alas, No nmh in RedHat 4 |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:59:37 -0400 |
>
> Not too fussed about obscure bugs personally, core functionality seems fine=
> to me. Apologies to those for whom it's not the case.
>
> I'm more concerned about nmh dying. If people have to compile from source,=
> there's a reasonable chance they won't bother. I'd love to see up-to-date=
> rpm and deb packages get included in the common repositories (redhat/ubunt=
> u/etc). This would probably be the best way to bring in new users in my op=
> inion.
>
It's in Fedora at least (I maintain it there). I don't ever expect nmh to
be in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, as they only have a finite amount of
engineering power, and there is certainly not enough demand for nmh.
The easiest way to get nmh running on RHEL4 is going to be this:
Download this:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/nmh-1.2-20070116cvs.4.fc9.src.rpm
(it's the Fedora 9 nmh source rpm)
Run:
rpmbuild --rebuild nmh-1.2-20070116cvs.4.fc9.src.rpm
At the very end you should see something like this:
Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/nmh-1.2-20070116cvs.4.i386.rpm
Just install that rpm.
--
JB
- [Nmh-workers] Alas, No nmh in RedHat 4, Norman Shapiro, 2008/04/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Alas, No nmh in RedHat 4, Joel Reicher, 2008/04/06
- [Nmh-workers] working towards a new release, Peter Maydell, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] working towards a new release, Josh Bressers, 2008/04/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] working towards a new release, Peter Maydell, 2008/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] working towards a new release, Peter Maydell, 2008/04/27