[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch
From: |
Josh Bressers |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:12:14 -0400 |
>
> I'm very leery of applying patches to m_getfld() unless they come
> with clear explanation and justification. The function is both
> critical and complicated and needs to be treated with care...
>
> Is there any way to find out who added these patches and why?
>
Here is the bug this is for:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57886
It has a testcase, so we should be able to easily sort out if that fix is
proper.
--
JB
- [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Anders Eriksson, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Peter Maydell, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch,
Josh Bressers <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Peter Maydell, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Anders Eriksson, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Josh Bressers, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Anders Eriksson, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Anders Eriksson, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Josh Bressers, 2008/04/08