[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch
From: |
Anders Eriksson |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:55:03 +0200 |
address@hidden said:
> See the test directory in the nmh CVS. I put that together quite some time
> ago, and I've gotten no feedback. It would be nice if someone else could
> give it a whirl to ensure the README is correct and it's not too confusing.
Read the README...
How is this expected to be expanded? I'd expect new cases to want to bring
crafted messages...
Doing the separate compile in the setup-test is not a great idea, imho. It'd
like to test what I just compiled, with the ./configure options I intend on
using in the target environment. I guess --prefix=$TEMPDIR is the reason, but
it really breaks the idea... (not sure about gentoo's test target, but it
_seems_ it wants to test the compiled-for-target version)
/Anders
- [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Anders Eriksson, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Peter Maydell, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Josh Bressers, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Peter Maydell, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Anders Eriksson, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Josh Bressers, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Anders Eriksson, 2008/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch,
Anders Eriksson <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() patch, Josh Bressers, 2008/04/08