Re: [Nmh-workers] vmh and other unused files

[David Levine]

Jerrad wrote:

> I do not think msh should be discarded. At worst, a build time option,
> but you never know when you might want/need it, so why not build it?
> It's a single, documented useful utility that provides a useful
> complement to packf. I've not had *much* call for it, but it's nice
> to know it's there if I do want to interact with a mail archive in a
> familiar way.

Paul wrote:

> fwiw i still like msh. i've used it as a login shell for some captive
> accounts.

Thanks.  Let's keep msh.

David